Intel Server CPUs Could Become Up to 30% Slower

Scroll this



Check prices now:
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 –
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 –
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 –
Intel Core i7-8700K –
Intel Core i5-8600K –
Intel Core i5-8400 –
Intel Z370 Motherboards –
AMD B350 Motherboards –
AMD X370 Motherboards –

Support us on Patreon

The Register

Phoronix

Intel Server CPUs Could Become Up to 30% Slower

FOLLOW ME IN THESE PLACES FOR UPDATES
Twitter –
Facebook –
Google Plus –
Instagram –

Music By:

35 Comments

  1. Just built (and spent a shed load on) an Intel 8700K based system, was considering Ryzen too.. so pissed off right now.

  2. Intel is being making dirty tricks since…FU Intel. From an i5 desktop.

  3. I would kill to have one of those GPUs T-T even a 750ti or older.
    My 7300le sucks as hell.

  4. "almost every intel processor manufactured in the last decade" well I guess that my Q6600 is safe then?

  5. i just got my i7 8700k a few weeks ago, 30% slower is just insane, a cheap budget amd cpu could easily beat it then, and the 8700k costs like 2 or 3 times the price of it, if the actual slow down is even near 10% ill have to find a way to revert it back, this will destroy intel's cpu market and will make the cheap amd cpu's a no brainer….

  6. My only issue is every benchmark and test I yhave seen is on the latest(coffe lake or kabylake) processors. and mostly only on the I7's Probably 60-70 percent of your viewers have I5's and are probably on skylake or earlier. Not everyone can afford to upgrade every year. How does the patch affect our performance? It may not be as good as on the kaby or the coffeelake.

  7. I guess you can say the hackers can easily get the “INTEL” from your computer ……………ba dum tsss

  8. My only issue is every benchmark and test I have seen For the intel meltdown/spectre patch. Is on the latest(coffe lake or kabylake) processors. and mostly only on the I7's Probably 60-70 percent of your viewers have I5's and are probably on skylake or earlier. Not everyone can afford to upgrade every year. How does the patch affect our performance? It may not be as good as on the kaby or the coffeelake. Also most of the performance could be do to GPU the 1080ti. Try running the same tests on a Skylake cpu say the I7 6700k Or the I5 6600k With a mid range gpu istead of a top of the line system. After all most of your viewers are probably on midrange systems.

  9. the security flaw with amd processors is still unknown so please don't say I have ryzen xxxx cpu I'm good. judging by how every single CPU is affected across platforms, it's highly plausible amd processors are affected by it too. also before you guys fire me as some Intel shill. I have an amd processor and hope that they are not affected but it seems very unlikely. amd statement is still unclear

  10. This sounds like a cut of switch by the hands deep state

  11. Shouldn't the news really be "Intel CPU's Still fast, could have been faster!"

  12. Not a problem! We got our network more secure than a fat man on a donut

  13. With other words you have a corrupt system. So happy I have a AMD system. And I will stay with them.

  14. I would buy AMD if they had any decent products available. Fact is that intel still dominates in most scenarios

  15. Didn't intel licence the x86-64 from AMD? So, if the bug comes from the x86-64 (aka AMD64) instruction set, what conclusion can we draw now? Shouldn't this affect AMD cpus too?

  16. Why is this being called a "flaw" when it is technically a hack exploit? Which, are VERY different things!

  17. This shit is why i stopped buying Intel years ago , this isn't the first time they held back important info from the consumer to keep the money flowing in, its very dishonest and the lame claim we didn't say anything because of hackers is PURE BULLISH its all about Intel UNADULTERATED GREED and fear of losing market share to AMD, they dont give a fuck about their customers and never have.

Submit a comment